Answer:
a) Briefly explain ONE important social or political response to the conflict over slavery in the period 1850-1855. One political response to slavery during 1850-55 was the idea of popular sovereignty. ... During the time period of 1855-60, "Bleeding Kansas" became a response to slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
Seventeenth Amendment, amendment (1913) to the Constitution of the United States that provided for the direct election of U.S. senators by the voters of the states.
Explanation:
Answer:
The effects of a series of invasions on culture vary from nation to nation. In some cases, languages were influenced by the conquering country's languages, as in Turkey where the Turkish invaders modified the language spoken there from Greek to include words from Turkish. In other cases, cultures assimilate and integrate into a new society through intermarriage and trade relations with its fellow nations. The strong-arm invasion illustrated Europe "discovered" or invaded by Europeans until it eventually became their home land even though they arrived as outsiders since that continent had always been populated before them.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is difficult to accurately predict what will happen to a culture because there are so many variables. A series of invasions may have various effects, for example dilution or disruption of existing cultural institutions which they evolved in response, influence on trade routes and economic activity dependent on those trade routes, alteration of government policies which might change laws governing cultural institutions, etc.
But it is clear that the effects will be unpredictable based on these two factors alone due to the utmost complexity involved with cultures unfolding over time. Still, one thing it's possible to be sure of is that past examples demonstrate certain aspects are likely.
Answer: Courts of Appeal have appellate jurisdiction when superior courts have original jurisdiction, and in certain other cases prescribed by statute. Like the Supreme Court, they have original jurisdiction in habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition proceedings (Cal.
Explanation:)
I can't really see the answers you've provided if you did but, i wrote an essay kind of thing on captain thomas preston's account of the boston massacre here are some parts of it.
the source was created on 1770, considered a primary source, it was written because he wanted to prove his innocence to the jurors. the author's purpose was so because the daughters of the revolution wanted to re-open the case. according to his source the soldiers started the boston massacre they started to fire without order, and that the mob yelled fire, meaning an actual fire.
plus from what I've written, i personally believe the colonists started the boston massacre because, <span>as stated by Captain Thomas a
First-hand account, they started taunting them and throwing snowballs along
with other objects because they did not want the British regulars in their
town. The commending officer ordered his men to fix their bayonets and join the
guard outside the building which they were having a meeting in, after the
colonists attacked the soldiers one rifle shot into the crowd to the other
soldiers began firing moments later. Five colonists were dead three more were
injured while the british soldiers were put on trail only two were found guilty
of man slaughter and their thumbs were branded with an ‘M’ for murder as
punishment. I believe this could have been prevented if the soldiers were not
outside fixing their guns at that time. And had the British parliament had not
taken over american taxation measures in boston, the british should’ve stayed over in britian. </span>
