Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
Answer:
It depends.
Explanation:
Usually, binge watching would not be considered to be harmful. However, to put such an activity in perspective, you should consider how it affects your daily life. An addiction to something would cause physical, mental, and/or emotional pain during separation and disturbs normal, daily life. Is binge watching causing that type of pain and interruption to your daily life? You have to decide for yourself how far and how seriously you view binge watching, and decide from there.
Answer:
In other words, do you have what it takes to be a champion?
Explanation: