The simplest interpretation would go a little something like this:
We know that we want the total donation amount to be more than $7,900, so we can set up this inequality to begin with

Where
D is the total donations raised (in dollars). How do we find D? Well, we just add up the total number of table reservations sold and the total number of single tickets sold. If we let
r stand for the number of reservation tickets and
s stand for the number of single tickets, then we have

So, the inequality representing this situation would be

And that would probably be fine for this problem.
<span><em>Footnote:</em>
</span>Of course, if this were a real-life scenario, we'd need to take some additional details into account: How many tables do we have? How many people can be seated at each table?
The inequality 4(x – 3) + 4 < 10 + 6x is solved as x > -9. Then the variable x is greater than the negative 9. Then the correct option is B.
<h3>What is inequality?</h3>
Inequality is defined as an equation that does not contain an equal sign.
The inequality equation is given below.
4(x – 3) + 4 < 10 + 6x
Then the steps of solving are given below.
1. The distributive property: 4x – 12 + 4 < 10 + 6x
2. Combine like terms: 4x – 8 < 10 + 6x
3. The addition property of inequality: 4x < 18 + 6x
4. The subtraction property of inequality: –2x < 18
5. The division property of inequality: x > –9
Then x is greater than the negative 9.
Then the correct option is B.
More about the inequality link is given below.
brainly.com/question/19491153
#SPJ1
Answer:
Area = 6647.610055 cm^2
Circumference = 289.02652413 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of Circle: Area = π*r^2
Circumference: C = 2*π*r or π*d
Area = π * 46^2 = 6647.610055
Circumference = 2*π*46 = 289.02652413
Answer:
Company 2 because it is gaining six times the number of employees, while Company 1 is only adding 6 employees every year.
Step-by-step explanation:
Looking at the table, the number of employees in Company 1 goes up by 6 employees per year.
The number of employees in Company 2 is multiplied by 6 every year; this means they gain more employees after the first year than Company 2 does (they go from 6 to 36, which is a gain of 30, while Company 1 goes from 6 to 12, a gain of 6).
If we are looking strictly at the number of employees, Company 2 is the better choice.