This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
Answer:
Simile ↔ C) My phone slipped through my fingers <u>like</u> butter.
Personification ↔ D) The <u>face</u> of my phone had many <u>scars</u> from being dropped.
Symbol ↔ A) I wanted to wave the <u>white flag</u> after searching for my phone.
Hyperbole ↔ E) My phone <u>is my lifeline</u> to the world.
Metaphor ↔ B) I wouldn't <u>trade</u> my phone <u>for a million </u><u>dollars</u>.
Explanation:
Whatever I underlined is supposed to hint at why each sentence matches the way it does.
For example: Similes compare ideas to each other, sort of like metaphors do, but they use the words "like" or "as" to do so.
Hope this makes sense :)
Answer:
The hospital called "old lady house" outside of the town. This story happens in the mid - morning of a cold day (fall or winter)
Explanation:
What about everlasting love ?
The answer here is D.
It uses a similie to make a comparison.
