<u>According to keynesianism, as more items are being made, what happens to prices D. the prices stay the same</u>
Explanation:
Keynes advocated that an increased government expenditures and lower taxes can stimulate demand and it can pull the global economy out of the depression.
Keynesians believe that, because prices are somewhat rigid, fluctuations in any component of spending like consumption, investment, or government expenditure will cause the output to change. If government spending increases, for example, and all other spending components remain constant, then output will increase.
<u>According to keynesianism, as more items are being made, what happens to prices D. the prices stay the same</u>
All are assumed except <u>A. Total variable costs remain the same over the relevant range.</u>
<u />
Cost-volume-profit analysis examines how changes in cost in volume affect income. Variable costs are ones that go up and down depending on production levels, so it would not make sense to assume that variable costs stayed the same over the relevant range.
Answer:
All of the following are organization-directed benefits associated with offering unconditional guarantees except:
a. the guarantee provides a means to avoid bankruptcy.
Explanation:
Providing or offering customers unconditional guarantees does not help the company to avoid bankruptcy. Bankruptcy arises from inadequate financing resulting from overtrading. Importantly, offering guarantees to customers communicates a clear performance goal to employees to improve service delivery to customers.
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
Answer:
here you go bruv
Explanation:
The New York Times published a chart today that succinctly explains why it is so hard to cut the federal government's spending: the programs that people want to cut don't cost very much, and the programs that cost a lot people don't want to cut.
