Answer: $2,500,000
Explanation:
Discontinued operations is when a particular division in a company shutdown.
With regards to the above question, the before-tax amount that Mercedes should report as loss on discontinued operations in its 2013 income statement will be:
= $2,000,000 + ($3,000,000 - $2,500,000)
= $2,000,000 + $500,000
= $2,500,000
Answer:
The "compose" or "draft" option allows you to type a new message.
Answer:
1 +1R4= {(1 +1R3)(1 + E(4r1) +L4)}1/4
1.0500 = {(1.0475)^3(1 + 0.0525 +L4)}1/4
(1.0500)^4= (1.0475)3^(1 + 0.0525 +L4)
(1.0500)^4/(1.0475)^3= 1 + 0.0525 + L4
(1.0500)4/(1.0475)^3-1.0525
L4= .0050358564 = 0.504%
(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
Answer:
The federal government can regulate Jen's activity citing the supreme court rule of the government ability to regulate any activity interstate or intrastate that affects interstate commerce.
In the line of this argument it means that a farmer growing and of goods affects interstate commerce.
The farmers best argument concerning the federal government regulating their activities due to interstate commerce is that his activities are purely local and although I don't believe any court will hear him out.
Explanation:
