Answer:
So to maximize profit 24 downhill and 20 cross country shouldbe produced
Step-by-step explanation:
Let X be the number of downhill skis and Y the number of cross country skis.
Time required for manufacturing and finishing each ski are: manufacturing time per ski, downhill 2.5 hours, cross country 1.5 hours
Finishing time per ski: downhill 0.5 hours, cross country 1.5 hours.
Total manufacturing time taken = (2.5) x+ (1.5+) y = 2.5x+1.5y≤90
total finishing time taken = 0.5x+1.5 y≤42
Profit function
Z = 50x+50y
Objective is to maximize Z
Solving the two equations we get intersecting point is
(x,y) = (24,20)
In the feasible region corner points are (0.28) (36,0)
Profit for these points are
i) 2200 for (24,20)
ii) 1400 for (0,28)
iii) 1800 for (36,0)
So to maximize profit 24 downhill and 20 cross country shouldbe produced.
Answer:
not me :)
Step-by-step explanation:
A simple answer is that any given trapezoid with height h and length of the parallel lines a and b, is half of a parallelogram with an area of (a+b) x h. Since the trapezoid is half of this, it is h(a+b)/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Population Mean (u) = 3.50
Sample (n)= 36
Sample mean (x) = 3.60
Population standard deviation (s)= 0.40
Test statistics:
(Null hypothesis) H0: u= 3.5 (Population mean is equal to 3.5)
(Alternate hypothesis) H1: u> 3.5 (Population mean is greater than 3.5)
Z= 
= 
= 
= 1.5
critical value= Z0.05= 1.645 (From Z table)
Since, Z value is less than critical Z value that is Z<1.645
We cannot reject null hypothesis
So, we decide to reject that the mean GPA of graduates exceeds 3.50
9514 1404 393
Answer:
A- Cai are used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.
Step-by-step explanation:
In step 4, Cai referred to the angles as "alternate interior." In fact, they are "corresponding." The reason used to justify congruence of the angles was invalid.
