Answer:
11253
Step-by-step explanation:
the steps are described in the picture above
The experimental research has two key advantages over correlational studies.
1. The possibility of random assignment
2. Causal connections can be assumed.
<h3>
What benefit does experimental research have over correlational research?</h3>
Correlational studies merely examine the data that already exists, whereas experimental studies give the researcher the opportunity to influence the study's factors. Researchers can make inferences about how changes in one variable affect changes in another through the use of experimental investigations.
The factors in a correlation study are out of the control of the researcher or research team. The researcher merely measures the information she discovers in the outside world. She can then determine whether changes in one are related to changes in the other, or if the two variables are correlated. In such a study, experimenters gather existing data and use statistical methods to examine it, such as economic statistics from governments. The findings of correlation studies can lead to hypotheses that can be verified through a more focused experimental one.
To learn more about correlational research visit:
brainly.com/question/14375687
#SPJ4
step 1
magsagot ka nang magsagot ng mga question yun lang basta maganda yung sagot mo
Answer:
The correct option is a
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 415
The sample proportion is 
Now
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
The test statistics is mathematically evaluated as
substituting values
Answer:
d. Jordan needs 1 and one-half cups of diced chicken for 3 salads
Step-by-step explanation:
cups of chicken are shown on the y axis, number of salads is shown on the x axes. For 3 salads you need 1.5 cups of chicken.