Answer: Damascus and Baghdad.
Explanation:
During the Middle Ages, they were the most essential two centers of the Arab world. According to many historians, between the seventh and the tenth centuries, they were the largest and most developed centers of the world. A high culture and civilization developed in these cities. The development of science and the arts that were among the major segments of the development of the Arab Empire was impressive. The Abbasids moved the 750th capital of the empire from Damascus to Baghdad, which thus became the center of Islamic culture and science.
Under the leadership of Abbasid, Islamic civilization inherited and assimilated the traditions and achievements of many cultures. An incredibly rich culture flourished in the cities, with Baghdad, Cordoba leading, and Cairo. The rise of Islamic civilization was attended by all the nations that are lived under the rule of Islam, including Jews and Christians. Later, the capital was moved to Baghdad and destroyed by the Mongols. Because these were the two largest cities, the most significant number of people lived in them.
Answer:
To prevent monopolies and oligopolies in economies.
Explanation:
Monopolies are organizations that have almost entire control of markets. <em>If I ran a monopolistic oil company in the US, I could in theory control the cost of oil by raising it higher/lower than any competitor and charge lots of households many more had there been competition.</em>
Oligopolies are organizations that work together to cut out competition, with the exception of the corporate ally. <em>If my buddy and I ran an oligopoly on oil, we would have control of the entire market together and control the costs of oil, in theory.</em>
Hope that helps, best of luck!
Judicial review is a process under which excecutive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.
"In his opinion it is morally wrong for any <span>political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones." This implies that he is basing his answer off his morals and opinions rather than using solely historical facts and examples to support his argument</span>