1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
3 years ago
12

The supply of aged cheddar cheese is inelastic, and the supply of bread is elastic. Both goods are considered to be normal goods

by a majority of consumers. Suppose that a large income tax increase decreases the demand for both goods by 10%. The change in equilibrium price will be:
a. increase in both the aged cheddar cheese and bread markets.
b. increase in the aged cheddar cheese market and a decrease in the bread market.
c. decrease in the aged cheddar cheese market and increase in the bread market.
d. a decrease in both the aged cheddar cheese and bread markets.
Business
1 answer:
Kryger [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D) a decrease in both the aged cheddar cheese and bread markets.

Explanation:

A 10% income tax increase will shift the aggregate demand curve to the left, reducing total demand. This should affect both necessities and luxury goods.

In this case, the demand curve for both aged cheddar cheese and bread will shift to the left, reducing the total quantity demanded at every price level. This will result in a lower equilibrium price for both goods.

You might be interested in
Which behaviors might lead someone to have a low credit score?
lara [203]
IF they spend more than they can afford

If they cannot pay back their loans at all

If they cannot pay back their loans on time

hope this helps
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
When a life insurance company advertises the safety and security of its products, it is using a ________ advertising strategy.
horrorfan [7]

I believe the answer is: C. persuasive

Persuasive advertising strategy, is a form of technique that is used to influence the consumers to do something, based on their pathos (appeal to the emotions)  logos ( appeal to their logical thinking) , and ethos (appeal to the ethical standard that they held in their life)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Altoid Company sold most of its inventory produced during the period. The manager needs to close the $1,200 balance of Manufactu
Likurg_2 [28]

Explanation:

The journal entry to close the books is

Cost of Goods sold A/c Dr $1,200

       To Manufacturing Overhead A/c $1,200

(Being the under-applied overhead is recorded)

Since the jobs were undercosted, that means the overhead is applied under overhead so we debited the cost of goods sold account and credited the manufacturing overhead account. Both the items are recorded for $1,200

5 0
3 years ago
Fernandez Company had an accounts receivable balance of​ $150,000 on December​ 31, Year 2 and​ $175,000 on December​ 31, Year 3.
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

The amount collected from customers on accounts receivable during year 3 is $535,000.

Explanation:

Cash received from accounts receivable = Opening balance of AR + Credit Sales - Bad debts written off - Closing balance of AR.

  • The opening balance for year 3 account receivables was 150000.
  • Credit Sales = 600000
  • Bad debts = 40000
  • Closing Balance = 175000

We can solve this question either by making a T account for accounts receivable or using the equation given above.

Cash = 150000 + 600000 - 40000 - 175000 = $535000

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Monique involves her staff as much as possible in decisions that affect guest services at the brainbook hotel. many of her emplo
    13·1 answer
  • What tax does the lower class pay little in, making the middle income pay more?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following typically happens as prices for a good or service rises?a. suppliers leave the marketb. consumers seek mo
    12·1 answer
  • Saving and loans associations are not subject to federal regulations
    5·1 answer
  • How much of a person's income should go to charities?
    13·1 answer
  • Last year Lowell Inc. had a total assets turnover of 1.40 and an equity multiplier of 1.75. Its sales were $295,000 and its net
    15·1 answer
  • Exercise 9-16
    11·1 answer
  • The production department of Zan Corporation has submitted the following forecast of units to be produced by quarter for the upc
    12·1 answer
  • Which loan type requires you to make loan payments while you’re attending school?
    5·2 answers
  • To ensure the highest levels of employee motivation, employers should strive to create work environments that?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!