Answer:
The orrect option is A "I and III only"
Explanation:
<u>Statement (I)</u> is true as a result of to work out the speed of come is commensurate with the risks concerned as it doesn’t create any intellect to stay the Funds in portfolio.
<u>Statement (III) </u>is true as a result of it is sensible to isolate funds they need undesirable returns or an excessive amount of association with alternative investments
Answer:
$500;$810
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that he painted his office and replaced the door at a cost of the amount of $500 which means that Travis has the amount of $500 in deductible direct expenses
Calculation for deductible indirect expenses.
First step is to calculate the utilities
Utilities= $3,000 x (240/2,400)
Utilities= $3,000 x 10%
Utilities= $300
Second step is to calculate the property taxes
Property taxes= $1,500 x 10%
Property taxes= $150
Third step is to calculate the mortgage interest
Mortgage interest= $3,600 x 10%
Mortgage interest= $360
Now let calculate the deductible indirect expenses.
Deductible indirect expenses=$300+$150+$360
Deductible indirect expenses=$810
Therefore Travis has $500 in deductible direct expenses and $810 in deductible indirect expenses.
<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
When compared to the country of origin principle, the country of reception approach to jurisdiction over internet transactions requires business managers to have more knowledge of the laws of other countries.
<h3>What is the significance of country of origin principle?</h3>
The country of origin principle is an important feature of leading parts of Union law. It is also known as<u> home country control, </u><u>country</u><u> of </u><u>origin</u><u> rule</u>, and <u>country of </u><u>origin</u><u> </u><u>principle</u><u>.</u>
The country of origin principle mainly aims to ensure the effective protection of the public interest in the country of origin.
Basically, the country of origin principle has the main purpose to vest exclusive jurisdiction to regulate in one Member State only.
Learn more about the country of origin principle here:-
brainly.com/question/16529312
#SPJ4
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Financial statements are written records that convey the business activities and the financial performance of a company. Financial statements are often audited by government agencies, accountants, firms, etc. to ensure accuracy and for tax, financing, or investing purposes.
These documents play a pivotal role in a financial institution, thus, not optional.
Cheers
