Answer:
The answer is option E) The type of analysis that Jamie is doing is best described as scenario analysis.
Explanation:
scenario analysis assesses the effect of changing all the input variables at the same time.
Scenarios being considered can relate to a single variable, such as the relative success or failure of a new product launch, or a combination of factors, such as the results of the product launch combined with possible changes in the activities of competitor businesses. The goal is to analyze the results of the more extreme outcomes to determine investment strategy.
In this case, scenario analysis is used in analyzing the estimated net present value of a project under various conditions by revising the sales quantity, sales price, and the cost estimates.
Have less information than used car sellers
Answer:
c) finish-to-start; start-to-start
Explanation:
Project dependencies are the time relationships between a predecessor and a successor in project management. In other words, these dependencies describe which activity among the two needs to start earlier or later and when it needs to start or finish compared to the other one.
The most common type of dependency in all projects (no matter the nature or industry) is the finish-to-start one, where the activity A needs to be completed before activity B starts, e.g. base nail polish has to be put before the top coat gets put on the nails.
The second most common type of dependency is the<em> start-to-star</em>t one, where two activities need to start at the same time. This is common for activities where synchronization is paramount.
Answer and Explanation:
There are several reasons why the number of lawsuits against auditors and the size of awards to plaintiffs has increased. Mainly, <em>Certified Public Accountant (CPA) firms are most likely to solve legal issues with companies in front of inaccuracies in audits without a judicial process</em> to avoid the fees, possible penalties they will have to take charge if found at fault. Thus, more lawsuits are created under that situation because those practices are not considered legal even if the plaintiff decides to come up to a resolution that way. This is because firms could still be operating unethically unless the law enforces laws in their operations.
Answer:
a. $9,338
b. 0.363
Explanation:
a. Contribution Margin = Sales - Variable Cost
Where Sales = $25,700
Variable Cost = Food & Packaging + Payroll + 40% x General, Selling and Administrative expenses
V.C. = 8,982 + 6,500 + 40% * 3,700
V.C = 8,982 + 6,500 + 1,480
= $16,362
Therefore, Contribution Margin = Sales - Variable Cost
= $25,700 - $16,362
=$9,338
b. McDonald's contribution margin ratio = Contribution Margin / Sales
= $9,338 / $25,700
= 0.363
