Dear Johnny, I didn't appreciate it when you pushed me down in the hallway at school. Especially when you starting kicking me in my ribcage (pretty sure you cracked a few) I also hated the incredible humiliation I went through as you kicked me without ceasing. I know your mad at me for telling the teachers that you cheated on my homework, but I had to do it. I mean either I was going to take the blame or it was gonna be you. And we both know I can't get into Harvard with a criminal record. I guess I'm just trying to say that I'm sorry. Not for ratting you out though, I'm sorry that you have become this type of person, this bully if you will. You''ll never get anywhere by beating me up every chance you get.
Your old friend, Matt.
(Hope this helped dude)
Because industrialization lead to a work force which eventually turned into a militarism because the work force could now make their own amo and guns which they didn't have to rely on other countries <span />
Villages needed to organize governments. is your best answer
Note that food surpluses means that there is extra food, which means that:
1) the population would increase, not decrease
2) there are more time to create tools, and possessions and other needed things can be kept longer
3) If you hunt and gather more, it would just result in more surpluses.
hope this helps
Answer:
to the first one it would be false
Explanation:
great brittin has no control over us now but it did when the pilgrams came over to America
<span>It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
This question is mildly ambiguous due to the word "communication". Does it mean "Speed of sending a message?" or "Speed of moving a physical object?" Given the available options as answers, I will assume the meaning is "Speed of moving a physical object?" With that in mind, let's look at the available options and see what makes sense.
It made coast-to-coast communication instantaneous.
* Even modern jets can't travel from coast to coast instantaneously, so you wouldn't expect a train to do so either. So this choice is just plain silly and therefore wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about a week to about a day.
* A stagecoach had an average speed of about 5 mph and covered 60 to 70 miles per day. So it's not going to go from coast to coast in only a week. And since that part of the answer is wrong, this choice is wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
* The 180 day estimate is definitely doable. That's an average speed of about 17 miles per day which is a good speed for a person walking day to day. And that would be about 400 miles per day for the train. The numbers make sense and this is the correct answer.
It made coast-to-coast communication more complicated.
* Let's see. Buy a train ticket and possibly arrange for 6 layovers. Or plan a multiple month trip and possibly coordinate that effort without having any rapid means of communications? This option is just plain silly when you consider the logistics of traveling for several months vs traveling for a mere week. So this is a bad choice.</span>
