C. Soviet forces invaded South Korea
Answer:
Monopolies and trusts were supported by the federal courts
Explanation:e2020
This is a very poor question - your teacher, clearly, understands very little about the collapse of the USSR and Gorbachev and his reforms.
<span>These 'provisions' are not what Perestroika was about - your teacher, and possibly your text book, has confused two completely separate and distinct Soviet reforms - Perestroika and Demokratizatsiya (democratisation). All of the 'Provisions of Perestroika' that you have listed are, in fact, parts of the Demokratizatsiya reforms. </span>
<span>Perestroika was the restructuring of party and state organisations, but particularly enterprises, factories, mines, collective farms and other 'means of production'. It sought to re-structure the command economy making it more efficient and better able to compete globally and to meet the needs of Soviet consumers and other end users. </span>
<span>What Perestroika demonstrated was the gross inefficiencies of the Soviet Command Economy, and that the economic base of the country needed frastic and radical reforms - not that the Communist system itself was failing. </span>
<span>303,450 casualties, about a fifth of their troops</span>
I think this is the complete question:
Read this passage from the Potsdam Declaration.
We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction.
Which best summarizes the intent of this passage?
Japan will be allowed to choose its conditions for surrender.
Japan must surrender without any conditions, or face destruction.
If Japan does not surrender, the Soviet Union will invade.
If Japan chooses to keep fighting, the Allies will ask for peace talks.
The answer would be:
Japan must surrender without any conditions, or face destruction.
