Answer:
80
Explanation:
Years = 20
Compounding month = 4 (quarterly)
N is the number of compounding factors = 20 years * 4 periods per year = 80. So, the value of n in the F/A factor (for determining F/A factor the end of the 20 year period) is 80.
Answer:
The Journal entry with their narrations shown below:-
Explanation:
The Journal Entry is shown below:-
1. Petty cash Dr, $271
To Cash $271
(Being establishment of petty cash fund is recorded)
2. Freight-in Expenses(delivery charges) Dr, $76
Supplies expenses Dr, $41
Postage expenses Dr, $49
Loan to employees (Accounts receivable) Dr, $33
Miscellaneous expenses Dr, $52
Cash short and over Dr, $8
To Cash $259
($271 - $12)
(Being disbursement of cash is recorded)
3. Petty cash Dr, $116
To cash $116
(Being increase in petty cash is recorded)
Answer:
one among the main importance is the foreign exchange of currency since it has a very higher exchange value compared to other tourism spots. exports to other countries from Nepal are very cheap and several good are produced on a large scale. ... cheap way of lifestyle attracts a lot of tourists all over the world.
Explanation:
the top should explain as much as I think.
The difference between position management and job management lies in the fact that;
- In Position Management, a position is created for each new employee/opening while In Job Management, no positions are necessary in order to create a job requisition.
<h3>Staffing Models</h3>
Conventionally, there are two types of staffing models:
- Position Management and
- Job Management.
In Position Management, it is necessary that a position is created for each new employee/opening. In such cases, reports show open positions and vacancy rates.
However, In Job Management, no positions are needed in order to create a job requisition.
Read more on staffing Models;
brainly.com/question/14702055
Answer:
pricing low
yes
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
if either firm charges high, they either earn 11 million or 2 million.
if either firm charges low, it would earn either 15 million or 8 million.
because the payoffs of charging low is higher than the payoffs of charging high, the best strategy is for the firms to charge low if there is no cooperation.
the game is a prisoners dilemma because the choice the firms make isn't the choice that will yield the highest payoffs. the choice that would yield the highest payoffs is to both charge high prices.
