Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Swap the fraction,

or around 7.142...
Maybe 4.80
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Lines c and b, f and d (option b)
Step-by-step explanation:
To prove whether the lines satisfy the condition of being a transversal to another, let's prove one of the conditions wrong, and thus the answer -
Option 1:
Here lines a and b do not correspond to one another provided they are both transversals, thus don't act as transversals to one another, they simply intersect at a given point.
Option 2:
All conditions are met, lines c and b correspond with one another such that b is a transversal to both c and d. Lines f and d correspond with one another such that f is a transversal to both d and c.
Option 3:
Lines c and d are both not transversals, thus clearly don't act as transversals to one another.
Option 4:
Lines c and d are both not transversals, thus clearly don't act as transversals to one another.
Answer:
B. m ∠ 1 = 90° and m ∠ 2 = 90°
Step-by-step explanation:
For most situations, the conjecture would probably be true, but there is one exception that makes this statement false.
When two right angles are supplementary, none of them is acute.
For an angle to be acute it needs to be lesser than 90°, and for a pair of angles to be supplementary they should add up to exactly 180°.
With a pair of right angles (90° each), their sum adds up to 180° but neither of them are acute.
Therefore, the answer is B. m ∠ 1 = 90° and m ∠ 2 = 90°
can be simplified as 5-9+7=-4+7=3