Appalachian<span> highlands, and Rocky </span><span>Mountains</span>
No, I do not agree that it was the soldiers and civilians that cost Germany the WWI. I believe that if the leaders had constructed a better thought out plan to defeat the other counties that they would have won. My current stand point is that if Germany appointed better Leaders that they could have easily took over Belgium within months.
Answer:
The French and Indian War and the Boston Tea Party.
Explanation:
Hope this helped :)
<span>During the contested election of 1876, Rutherford Hayes and Samuel Tilden were bitterly debating over who was the rightful winner of the White House. The Compromise of 1877 came from these disagreements: Hayes was given the White House, but would also pull the northern troops from the southern states and would end Reconstruction. This ended up leading to the rise of Jim Crow laws and de jure slavery by many of those same states.</span>