Answer:
A: -41/9
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute the point (4, -5) and slope -1/9 into the equation y = mx + b.
-5 = -1/9(4) + b
-5 = -4/9 + b
Solve for b:
b = -41/9
Our equation: y = -1/9(x) - 41/9
Answer:
vbvcfvbnbvcxcvbnvcxvbnmbvcvbvfdfgbhnbgvfgvbnbgfghbnbgvfgvbnbgfgbngfgbgfgfgfgfgfgfgfgfgfgfgrrrdrd
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3> - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~<u>Hello There</u>!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
</h3>
➷ Hank charges $75 for a visit plus $45 per hour.
Therefore, for an hour, Hank would charge $120 as 75 + 45 = 120
Mr Fixit:
As it is for one hour, we look at the first function because the time is 'less than or equal to an hour'.
Mr Fixit would charge $95 for an hour.
Therefore, Hank charges $25 more than Mr Fixit.
➶Hope This Helps You!
➶Good Luck :)
➶Have A Great Day ^-^
↬ Hannah ♡
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
we search for a square number so that rows*plantsInARow gives us the number
The number should be around 50², guessed
50² = 2500 (to low)
51² = 2601 (still to low)
52² = 2704 (bingo)
now to get from 2624 to 2704 plants he needs 80 more. That is the least number.
He could also go to plant 60² plants an than need slot more.
(would really appreciate the brainliest)
