I think it begins with the prosecutor...sorry if I’m wrong...:(
Answer:
United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.
Explanation:
The legal advice that would be given here would depend on whether or not the person who accepted to purchase the shock absorber acted as an agent or broker.
<h3>Who is an agent or broker?</h3>
A broker is described as a person or organization that negotiates contracts and serves as a middleman between a buyer and a seller in exchange for a fee.
A broker is a non-party to a transaction and is distinct from an agent, who represents the primary party in a transaction.
It is important to note that the element that changes the equation is whether or not the "someone" carried out the above transaction for a fee to them.
If they did, the they may be liable to ensure that you got proper value for money. If not, then they are not liable, they were simply acting on your instruction.
Another line of recourse would be to check the warranties and guaranties given on the product that was purchased.
Learn more about agency:
brainly.com/question/23534924
#SPJ1
Answer:
because they will be able to make decision which is right or wrong based upon their moral values. A couple who has conceived after a long medical intervention is requested to make a decision in regards to abortion in view to save the life of women who is comatose due to an accident.
I hope this helped!!!
