Answer:
No this was not the case for me and I was not aware that it was a good idea to have the opportunity to speak to the
Answer: The in general government assess framework is progressive, with add up to government assess burdens a bigger rate of salary for higher-income family units than for lower-income family units. A few government charges are backward, as they make up a bigger rate of wage for lower-income than for higher-income families.
Source: taxpolicycenter.org
D makes more sense so try D
Answer:
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
paragraphs are in the Explanation
Explanation:
Option 1: They shouldn’t because that’s there property that got destroyed.
There could have been something that the land owners wanted to tare down because they wanted to build something new, that could benefit them.
Its there property that they bought with there money they should be able to build something on it.
It might benifit society and themselves so I believe yes.
_________________________________________________________
Option 2: They should because it could be used for the government in some way.
It was frequently damaged by nature so they must have been tired of see it being rebuilt and destroyed.
It could be benifical to the area around it.
It could save the land owner money to
sorry if it’s not to your likeing or if it took so long
Advice, Search up the laws in Arkansas. Know what you know about bullying and think about what laws could be made to lower the levels of bullying happening. Then think what would you have to put in the letter to make the law active.
Good luck :)
