Answer:
C
Explanation:
wikipedia says: "The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house or House of Representatives, but required the upper house or Senate to be weighted equally among the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house."
This would be a perfect example of the system of barter as you are trading one book for the other. You can see from here what barter is, a trading system which involves direct exchange of goods without some kind of medium of exchange, for example money. Services can also be traded this way.
Yes, if the biospecimens are de-identified then the research is no longer considered human subjects research.
Option: C
Explanation:
It is in the norms that in same type of research, both the researchers need to maintain some ethics and rules that if they do same type of experiments and use same materials they should acknowledge the other or take permission before doing that.
Here researcher A is conducting research on emphysema using bio specimen from human subjects and researcher B is doing research on lung cancer. He also need bio specimen. But as it is mentioned in the consent form that specimen is de identified so no problem for researcher B in using same specimen like researcher A.
