Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
i think the answer is A. but not 100% sure
Answer: People cut down large parts of it to find animals to put in zoos.
Explanation: Your not really going to have people cutting down forests for Animals to put in zoos. That is not really legal.
Answer:
The correct answer is : The end of communism and a rocky transition to federalism
Explanation:
The transition would involve the organization of public power so that the government on at least two levels respond to the people that it serves. As a way of resolving conflict, when they start forming the new country federations may be established to assist democratization.
Answer:
machinery because capital resources are man-made things.
