According to jones and colleagues, the framework of mental toughness contains two subcomponents belief and focus.
The time period "intellectual longevity" is used by athletes, coaches, sports psychologists, and sports commentators to refer to an athlete's disposition and ability to deal effectively with demanding situations, stressors, and strain in sports.
In-game, perhaps the maximum defying function of an elite athlete is their degree of intelligence. toughness. intellectual toughness refers to an athlete's capacity to persist in the face of challenges, errors, and failure.
Mental toughness offers you the self-assurance needed to keep pushing ahead no matter the competitive state of affairs. the important thing element of mental durability is the capacity to recognition at the undertaking right in front of you. you spot, that athletes that lack intellectual durability have an out-of-place recognition
Learn more about mental toughness here:brainly.com/question/24516788
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. courage, recognition, relationships, responsibility, wealth
Explanation:
Mark me braianlest pls
Answer:
He believed that the social interactions with adults and more learned peers can facilitate a child’s potential for learning. Without this interpersonal instruction, he believed children’s minds would not advance very far as their knowledge would be based only on their own discoveries.
Vygotsky’s best known concept is the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Vygotsky stated that children should be taught in the ZPD, which occurs when they can almost perform a task, but not quite on their own without assistance. With the right kind of teaching, however, they can accomplish it successfully.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It is stated in the constitution that you must be of the age of 25 to be in the house of rep and 30 to be in senate.
The two articles of the constitution if you would like to read more.
U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 2, clause 2
[U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3, clause 3]
The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
