1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zarrin [17]
3 years ago
6

How did La Raza use resistance to live up to our idea of freedom, equality, and democracy?

History
1 answer:
rjkz [21]3 years ago
5 0
After demanding both political and military action on removing Native American Indians from the southern states of America in 1829, President Andrew Jackson signed this into law on May 28, 1830. Although it only gave the right to negotiate for their withdrawal from areas to the east of the Mississippi river and that relocation was supposed to be voluntary, all of the pressure was there to make this all but inevitable. All the tribal leaders agreed after Jackson’s landslide election victory in 1832.

It is generally acknowledged that this act spelled the end of Indian Rights to live in those states under their own traditional laws. They were forced to assimilate and concede to US law or leave their homelands. The Indian Nations themselves were force to move and ended up in Oklahoma.

The five major tribes affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. These were called The Civilised Tribes that had already taken on a degree of integration into a more modern westernised culture, such as developing written language and learning to read and write.

It overturned the more concessionary attitude of ex-President George Washington that aimed for ‘acculturation’ after debate with the Indian Nations. Even in those distant times, there was heated debate in congress with such famous names as the future president Abraham Lincoln and Davy Crockett speaking out against it. Now it is considered with serious negativity by all involved.
You might be interested in
Explain the basic principles of Jacksonian Democracy. Which principles are part of modern American politics? Answer in a complet
posledela

Answer:

The Jackson Presidency :

Andrew Jackson’s presidency was a highly controversial period characterized by Jacksonian democracy and the rise of the common man.

Explanation:

Jacksonian Democracy

“Jacksonian democracy” refers to the period of time (roughly 1828–1840) dominated by the controversial presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829–1837). Jackson, a westerner and the hero of the Battle of New Orleans (1815), ran for the presidency in 1824 but lost to John Quincy Adams. He ran again in 1828 and won in a landslide.

Jacksonian democracy was the political movement toward greater democracy for the common man. Jackson’s policies followed Jeffersonian democracy, which had dominated the previous political era. The Democratic-Republican Party of the Jeffersonians had become factionalized in the 1820s, and Jackson’s supporters began to form the modern Democratic Party; they fought the rival Adams and anti-Jacksonian factions, which soon emerged as the Whigs.

While Jeffersonians favored educated men (though they opposed inherited elites), the Jacksonians gave little weight to education. The Whigs were the inheritors of Jeffersonian democracy in terms of promoting schools and colleges. In contrast to the Jeffersonian era, Jacksonian democracy promoted the strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of Congress, while also seeking to broaden the public’s participation in government. Jacksonians demanded elected (not appointed) judges and rewrote many state constitutions to reflect these new values. There was usually a consensus among both Jacksonians and Whigs that battles over slavery should be avoided.

The Philosophy

Jacksonian democracy was built on the principles of expanded suffrage, Manifest Destiny, patronage, strict constructionism, and laissez-faire economics.

Expanded Suffrage

The Jacksonians believed that voting rights should be extended to all white men. By 1820, universal white-male suffrage was the norm, and by 1850, nearly all requirements to own property or pay taxes had been dropped. The fact that many men were now legally allowed to vote did not necessarily mean they would, and local parties systematically sought out potential voters and pulled them to the polls. Voter turnout soared during the Second Party System, reaching about 80 percent of the adult white men by 1840.

Manifest Destiny

The concept of “Manifest Destiny” was the belief that white Americans would inevitably settle the American West and expand control from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific and that the West should be settled by yeoman farmers. However, the Free Soil Jacksonians, notably Martin Van Buren, argued for limitations on slavery in the new areas to enable the poor white man to flourish; they split with the main party briefly in 1848. The Whigs generally opposed Manifest Destiny and expansion, saying the nation should build up its cities.

8 0
4 years ago
evaluate the extent to which the Mongols transformed social and political life from 1200 C.E. to 1600 C.E.
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

decimated Europe's population, political, and economic systems

Explanation:converted to Islam and was a great admirer of the sophisticated culture

5 0
4 years ago
Why did Miguel Hidalgo give a speech in the city of Dolores?
kramer

Answer:

he rang the church bell in Dolores to call his parishioners to an announcement of revolution against the Spanish.

Explanation:

The Cry of Dolores occurred in Dolores, Mexico, on 16 September 1810, when Roman Catholic priest Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla rang his church bell and gave the call to arms that triggered the Mexican War of Independence.

8 0
2 years ago
Which statement best explains the Three-Fifths Compromise?
andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

The correct answer is: For the purposes of determining the population of a state, three out of every five enslaved people would be counted

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
On the islands in Ocean there are few jobs many residents depend on income earned by family members working overseas
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It isn't as big, meaning their is less natural resources which means less money. Family members go out to sea to get money in countries like Brazil or the U.S

Now I usually beg for brainliest, but I don't care about it, well I do, but chances are I wont get it.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 30 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!! PPPPPPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASSSSSSSEEEEEEE HELP!
    15·2 answers
  • What trend does this map demonstrate about the migration patterns of hunter-gatherers?
    13·2 answers
  • Which amendment guarantees hat states can defend themselves?
    7·1 answer
  • Shay’s rebellion definition in relation to the federal government
    9·1 answer
  • What are two common key concepts between Christianity and Judaism? Both religions share several religious books. Both religions
    8·2 answers
  • The _____ tells the national government what it can and cannot do and lists the rights guaranteed to states.
    15·1 answer
  • Which events led to the United States’ involvement in World War I? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Why was protecting Religious Freedom important back then?<br> How do you know?
    15·1 answer
  • At this rate who do you think is winning?
    10·2 answers
  • Why were kibbutzim such as the one shown here important to the newly formed nation of Israel? (1 point)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!