Answer: 198 pretty sure dude
Explanation:step by step explantion gl :)
Answer:
"Woolmington v DPP [1935] UKHL 1 is a landmark House of Lords case, where the presumption of innocence was first articulated in the Commonwealth. In law the case is remembered for introducing the metaphorical "golden thread" ... for a unanimous Court, Viscount Sankey made his famous "Golden thread" speech."
Explanation:
The supreme court ruled in Katz vs United States expands the fourth amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to cover electronic wiretaps.
Explanation:
Katz found guilty because of illegal gambling and the appellate court found that there was no physical intrusion into the phone booth and there was no need for warrant.
The supreme court uses a wiretap to intercept a private telephone conversation and was not a search for fourth amendment.
The majority opinion of Katz vs United States had overturned the court of appeals affirmation of the conviction.
The fourth amendment is the bill of rights of constitution that protects people from unlawful searches and occupation.
it's so that people don't get overcharged for a small crime
^^^^ previous answer was a miscommunication
