1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
12

Why were civil rights supporters disappointed with the supreme courts 1896 decision in plessy v. Ferguson?

History
2 answers:
liq [111]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is: "It accepted the constitutionality of the 'separate but equal' and allowed the proliferation of segregated public facilities".

The Plessy v. Ferguson case led to the enactment of a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1896.

Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated schools and the constutionality of the "separate but equal" principle under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality, such education system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens by the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution.

Serga [27]3 years ago
6 0

Why were civil rights supporters disappointed with the Supreme Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson?

The civil rights supporters were disappointed with the supreme court’s decision of 1896 on the Plessy vs. Fergusson case as the Supreme Court affirmed the idea of ‘separate but equal’ which meant that racial segregation in the United States could be allowed as long as both races had access to facilities that would be equal in quality to each of their counterparts.

Further Explanation:

The background to the Plessy vs. Fergusson case was deeply rooted within racial segregation in the United States of America that denied facilities and opportunities to African Americans, and were normally given to their ‘racially superior’ Anglo Americans. An African American passenger, Homer Plessy was convicted for violating the Separate car Act in Louisiana n 1892, by allegedly refusing to travel in a coach meant for black Americans. He appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming a violation of his constitutional rights was caused under the Fourteenth Amendment Act, however, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that merely implied the legal distinction between the Blacks and Whites could not be deemed unconstitutional. Thus, the idea of ‘separate but equal’ was born, and separate carriage cars for Blacks and Whites had to be provided, with similar facilities. This was extended to other public facilities, including educational institutions. During the next few years, the Northern States maintained a somewhat casual attitude to the horrifying psychological and sociological implications of racial segregation, however, the African Americans of the Southern States mounted up a resistance against the regulations imposed in the Jim Crow Era.

Learn more:

1. When Benito Mussolini came into power, he promised to? brainly.com/question/3093240

2. During the 1925 scopes trial, the prosecution’s main argument was that? brainly.com/question/2162509

Answer Details:

Grade:High School

Chapter: Racial Segregation in the United States

Subject: History

Keywords:

Racial segregation, separate but equal, separate car Act.

You might be interested in
How weak and corrupt rulers affected the government and the economy.
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

When a gouvernement have  corrupt rulers it loses its sense of justice wich make it ruled by money . Weak rulers cannot improve the nation's economy nor the corrupt ones.

4 0
3 years ago
What were the important challenges facing farmers at the tun of the 20th century, and how did farmers respond to them?
mrs_skeptik [129]
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

Disappointed by this apparent out of line treatment, ranchers swung to gatherings, for example, the Populist Party to endeavor to address their. Agriculturists had issues with the railways in the late 1800s. The agriculturists trusted they weren't being dealt with decently or similarly by the railroad organizations.  

The issues confronting the agriculturist of the late nineteenth Century were wide. They extended from falling harvest costs, to uncalled for treatment by the railways, and furthermore the battle to have silver instituted as cash, in exertion to expand the estimation of a dollar.  

Agriculturists trusted that loan fees were too high on account of monopolistic moneylenders, and the cash supply was deficient, delivering emptying. A falling cost dimension expanded the genuine weight of obligation, as ranchers reimbursed advances with dollars worth essentially more than those they had acquired.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statements about hydrothermal vents are true?
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

2 and 4

Could you please help me with the recent question of mine unanswered on my page? I will give u brainliest and 20 points! :))) X

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need some help in this section
IrinaK [193]

The Articles of Confederation did not unify the states ad gave them too much power.

Answer: Option D.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States of America. It did not want a strong central government because it feared that the government that would over power the local government would be too powerful, so not much power was given to the central government. Thus they did not have much power to impose tax.

Thus the Article of Confederation gave more power to the state compared to the central government. But this created a problem of argument and jealousy among the various states of the country.

3 0
3 years ago
If you convinced your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern, what would this situation be an example of
ASHA 777 [7]
It seems that you missed the given choices of the question above; but anyway, here is the correct answer. The correct answer would be RHETORIC. When you are able to convince your principal to cancel an assembly because of a political concern, this situation is an example of a rhetoric. Rhetoric is defined as the art of persuasion by using effective written, spoken or visual language.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • who was Athenian ruler advanced the cause of democracy by taking steps to allow all citizens to participate in their government.
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST What happened at Fort Pillow?
    9·2 answers
  • Which african-american author and statesman did w.
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the first president ​
    15·2 answers
  • Look at the graphic. According to this graphic, what was the role of midwestern cities in the meatpacking industry?
    8·2 answers
  • 1. What was one effect of the 1858 gold rush on Vancouver Land?
    15·1 answer
  • Check out this app! It's millions of students helping each other get through their schoolwork. https://brainly.app.link/qpzV02Ma
    10·2 answers
  • I need help please from anyone. This is Due today!!​
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the English Parliament pass the Navigation Acts in 1651?
    7·2 answers
  • Which subject is specifically addressed in the Georgia State Constitution?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!