The rapid urbanization in Southeast Asia has caused many problems. As the urbanization was way to rapid, and it was not well planned, the urban areas look like everything but urban. The housing problem is huge, as there's not enough for the demand on place, so lot of people live in very small living areas. The basic needs for life, like clean water and electricity are not on good level, often lacking. The environment has been destroyed because of clearing up space, but also after the people have settled, as the garbage and sewage go directly into the closest water bodies. Fertile soil that could have been used for agriculture has been destroyed for building settlements. The badly planned urbanization also led to building on places that are not safe, like places where there are low ground waters and aquifers, places that are always under danger of floods, places that have soft sediments and sink.
Answer:
This description of Sandra indicates that she exhibits many of the same characteristics as someone who c. has an intellectual disability.
Explanation:
People who present intellectual disabilities have the characteristics described in the question, among others. Since they have problems with logical reasoning and abstract concepts, they often oversimplify things and have difficulty generalizing. Compared to other people, they commonly show poorer vocabulary and difficulty keeping up with required academic skills. They can also present difficulties concerning emotional and behavioral regulation, feeling frustrated and even angry while interacting with others. Those problems may lead to low self-esteem.
Because it is there not only to keep religion out of government, but to keep government out of religion. ... Jefferson was committed to this separation because he had little faith in the capacity of a government run or even influenced by religious leaders to protect individual rights and ensure liberty for all.
Answer:
Regulating trade gave congress with the power to control the economy. This power will enable the congress to distribute wealth to a certain group or people as they will.
Explanation:
In the united states government, Congress is a part of the legislative branch. This means that Congress has the power to create laws and regulations taht imposed in united states. This include the power to regulate trade/commerce.
Various debates has raised regarding this issue. Many people believed that the power to regulate trades should be given to the executive branch since this branch tend to get the most blame if the economy goes bad. It's pretty rational to held one branch accountable for a certain situation while the situation is actually being controlled by another branch/
Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
