Answer:
Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.
I think it might be B, but i'm not 100 percent sure. <span />
The major causes for the start and development of the World War II are the expansionism, nationalism, and natural resources.
This war was started because of the territorial appetites of some countries, namely Germany, Italy, and Japan, each them having their own vision and primary goal. Germany wanted to take over all the historic territories where the Germanic people lived, Italy wanted to resurrect the Roman Empire, while Japan wanted to get hold onto parts of Asia that were rich in natural resources as they have very few.
The nationalism led to mass murders on ethnic basis, with Germany and Japan being the biggest contributors to that, killing all the people that they considered as lesser human being or not suitable.
The natural resources were also one of the main reasons. Germany was trying to get to multiple places that were rich in natural resources, especially with oil, which is why the Soviets were attacked, so that Germany can get its hands on Azerbaijan. Japan too wanted and managed to conquer territories that were rich in oil and metals, as well as other natural resources, providing them with basis for further expansion and strengthening.
One of the primary reasons why the
attack of the Byzantine Empire by the Turks was significant that when the Turks
initially attacked the Byzantine Realm, the Holy Lands which were also in the
empire were overrun. <span>This lead to Alexius I asking the Pope for Christian knights
to help him in the Crusades which then lead to Pope Urban II to allow the
Crusades to happen.</span>
I believe the answer is the first option the constitution is what we follow and controls the government that is why it is the first option
