Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
Revenue before continuing business 585000
less:income tax -187000
Continuous business revenue 398,000
Operations stopped
Loss of non-compliance -75000
Less: Applicable drop in income tax from 25500 - 49500
net sales 348500
Popular inventory per share
Continued operating revenue ![[\frac{398000}{100000}] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \$3.98](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B398000%7D%7B100000%7D%5D%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%243.98)
Losses on disrupted businesses, tax net![[\frac{-49500}{100000}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B-49500%7D%7B100000%7D%5D)
Net-0.495
Net profits ![[\frac{348500}{100000}] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3.485](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B348500%7D%7B100000%7D%5D%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%20%5C%203.485)
Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.
To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.
It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.
Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.
Answer:
Yes, sales have increased as a result of the advertising campaign.
Explanation:
Find attached the explanation.
Note: I had to convert the explanation into both jpeg and files (both contains the same answer) when the answer box kept on rejecting my answer claiming it contains swear words when it does not.
Answer:
b. The stock price will not change, because the market had already incorporated the information about the FDA approval announcement in the stock price.
Explanation:
If the markets are strong form efficient, it means the consensus of the market related to future impact of FDA approval on earnings would be correct, the stock price of today correctly estimates the future earnings, and therefore the stock price would not change when the earnings are released.
Answer:
Dr cash $310,831
Dr discount on bonds payable $29,169
Cr bonds payable $340,000
On 30th June 2021
Dr interest expense $ 15,542
Cr cash $15,300
Cr discount on bonds payable $242
On 31st December 2021
Dr interest expense $ 15,554
Cr cash $15,300
Cr discount on bonds payable $254
Explanation:
The bond issued at a discount is the first bond whose cash proceeds of $310,831 were less than face value of $340,000.
Discount=face value -cash proceeds=$340,000-$310,831=$29,169.00
Find attached bond amortization schedule.
