Hi, you've asked an incomplete/unclear question. The full question read;
Which of the phrases below is <u>not</u> in the future perfect continuous?
a) You will have been waiting here for three hours by 8 o'clock.
b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.
c) By the end of next month I will have been living here for ten years.
d) When I finish this course, I will have been learning Italian for ten years.
e) Next month I will have been working here for two years.
Answer:
<u>b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.</u>
Explanation:
We make this conclusion because the phrase <em>"will have been" </em> (which is the future perfect of the verb "to be") is often added to the subject of a sentence to make it future perfect continuous.
However, after careful check of all the sentences, we notice all of them except option b used the future perfect continuous phrase, <em>"will have been." </em>
D...carbon dioxide is an insignificant part...
I'm in AP lang and I would say an argumentative because you have create a counter claim which needs a lot of evidence
When I was alive I was keeping up with my oldest sister who used to threaten me and my other sister lol... during that time there was also politics going around and fires and plane crashes. Ofc I was only born in 2008 so..
