This was because of state’s rights. The early government was weak because the
early and states were prioritized out fear that they will again dictated like
the British did to them. As a result the
government was not able to function properly. Due to the weakness from its
constitution known as the Articles of Confederation, they realized that they
needed stronger government and a new constitution.
Latin both is and was used to spread information and knowledge. Look at scientific nomenclature, classic Catholic texts, or the art of the Renaissance; Latin is usually the basis of, lr at least or included in the work itself. Latin was used for this purpose because, as Latin is a dead language, it doesn’t change. Any other language, as it is still spoken, may be morphed or changed with small inconsistencies in dialects or spellings over time. Since Latin isn’t regularly spoken, it allows for knowledge to remain the same over time and lands. This is why Latin was the choice for a universal language used to communicate the vast amounts of know,edge being discovered at the time.
I hope this helps :)
Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
I believe they received food from soup kitchens and bread lines, they offered free or low-cost food for people.
