Architectural advances of Rome is a propaganda showing beyond a shadow of a doubt the power and prestige of the empire.
<h3>What was the architecture of ancient Rome?</h3>
Architecture of ancient Rome serves as the wide range of civil engineering structures as well as, public buildings in the empire.
However, the architectural advances of Rome also symbolize the propaganda that proclaim how big and prestige the roman empire is.
Learn more about architectural Rome at:
brainly.com/question/13523880
Answer: google just use google brainly sucks
<span>I would suggest treating the Indians in a more humane way. It's also probably better to let an Indian leader (who obeyed our colonists) rule the Indians, because the leader would know the people and better communicate with them. And the colonists could indirectly benefit instead of being in conflict with the Indians directly.</span>
The battle of Tours united Christians against Islamic expansion and this among the following events allowed Christianity to act as a unifying force in Medieval Europe. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the last option or option "d".
Answer:
Convincing the people to shift the capital would be pretty easy. I would advice the sultan to presented the idea through military point of view. Daultabad were located on higher elevation than Delhi. Which means that in case an attack happened to the capital, the military will have high ground to fight from as an advantage.
Convincing the people to change currencies would be more difficult.
Traders, craftsmen, artisans, and performers built the current economy using the old currency. Changing it right away will caused a disruption in the economy. I would advice the sultan to order a slow transition. Meaning that he need to pass a law that enable the use of both old and new currencies for a couple of years. This will help the people getting used to the new currencies before we eventually stop its usage in the future.