Answer:
functional theorists
Explanation:
The Functionalists believed that the stability of the society is reached when its parts contribute towards it. They added that each part of the society is functional in its approach. They perform their functions and helps in reaching stability. Every component has an integral role to play. Functionalism defines each institution to be existing because of the role it plays to bring stability in society.
Attitudes formed through more likely experience typically influence behavior more consistently than attitudes formed through having a weak effect on behavior experience.
Attitudes are formed directly as a result of experience. They may arise from direct personal experience or from observation.
Attitudes affect people's behavior both positively and negatively. People are not always aware of their attitudes and their impact on their behavior. People who have a positive attitude (contentment, friendliness, etc.) towards their work and colleagues can have a positive impact on those around them.
Attitudes are general and persistent positive or negative opinions or feelings about people, things, or issues. Attitudes are formed by direct experience or the persuasion of others or the media. Attitude has three bases: emotion, behavior, and cognition.
Learn more about Attitudes at
brainly.com/question/25379849
#SPJ4
Answer:
Congress was concerned about how admitting it as a slave state would affect representation and the balance of power between states.
Explanation:
During that period, Missouri was a huge area that was called Missouri Territory and by 1819, there were enough people in part of that so it could be considered a state. But to be considered a state the Congress had to approve it.
In that period there was a struggle between free states and pro-slavery states the union wanted a balance between those two and the addition of a new state could ruin that balance.
The admission of Missouri would have added a slave state to the Senate and left northern non-slave states as a minority. This is the reason the application of Missouri caused a two-year debate.
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
