Marble, Roman copy after a Greek original from ca. 430 BCE. The Athenian democracy of Cleisthenes<span>and </span>Pericles<span> was based on freedom, through the reforms of Solon, and equality (isonomia), introduced by </span>Cleisthenes<span> and later expanded by Ephialtes and</span>Pericles<span>.</span>
Mesopotamia is located in the portions of modern day Iraq and some of its neighboring countries, between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates.
The fertile crescent Crescent included Mesopotamia, Israel and Egypt.
<span />
Answer:
A) The US sent two representatives to buy the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803.
Explanation:
The statement that best describes the Louisiana Purchase is "The US sent two representatives to buy the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803."
Robert Livingston was the US Minister to France. President Jefferson ordered him to negotiate with France the Purchase of New Orleans. Negotiation went slow with French Charles Maurice de Talleyrand. That is why President Thomas Jefferson sent James Monroe to France to help Livingston with the negotiation. The negotiation ended when the United States accepted to pay France $11,250,000 for the Louisiana territory (828,000 square miles). The deal was done on May 2, 1830.
You can choose a price that <u>maximizes your profits</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
If you are the only clothes producer in the industry, it is known as monopoly. Monopoly means a single seller selling a unique product without competition.
The monopoly seller has the right to choose the price for his goods. He can fix the price in the way to maximize his profit. As he is the sole seller, he will not have any competitions in the industry. This in turn helps him to make lot of profit on producing clothes with full freedom in fixing the price of the clothes.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.