Answer:
B. She lost a valuable ally in Rome.
Explanation:
The Answer:
You’re gonna have to give a picture mate.
The true vision of Karl Marx about communism is something that objectively would never work in practice. The problem is that the human nature and the Marx's vision of communism are not going very well together. According to Marx, all people should be in the same hierarchical level, thus horizontal hierarchy. Everyone should be paid equally, no matter the type of job, and everyone should get the same services. There's no private ownership and the economy is totally controlled by the government in a manner to be self-sustaining. Big problem in these things is that the humans stride toward progress and success, so by putting everyone in the same basket the creative minds and the successful people are destroyed, while the lazy ones, and the ones that do not have great potential get the benefits without deserving them. The economy can simply not function in a manner to be self-sustaining, and it will always be on the verge of collapse, and there will always be huge problems with lack of food and products.
Answer: an’s Tokugawa (or Edo) period, which lasted from 1603 to 1867, would be the final era of traditional Japanese government, culture and society before the Meiji Restoration of 1868 toppled the long-reigning Tokugawa shoguns and propelled the country into the modern era. Tokugawa Ieyasu’s dynasty of shoguns presided over 250 years of peace and prosperity in Japan, including the rise of a new merchant class and increasing urbanization. To guard against external influence, they also worked to close off Japanese society from Westernizing influences, particularly Christianity. But with the Tokugawa shogunate growing increasingly weak by the mid-19th century, two powerful clans joined forces in early 1868 to seize power as part of an “imperial restoration” named for Emperor Meiji. The Meiji Restoration spelled the beginning of the end for feudalism in Japan, and would lead to the emergence of modern Japanese culture, politics and society.
Explanation:
<u>Difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region:</u>
<u>New England:</u>
- New Englanders as a result of rough soil had constrained cultivating so they needed to go to timber, hide, and angling.
-
Homesteaders in the New England settlements suffered harshly cool winters and mellow summers.
-
The land was level near the coastline yet turned out to be bumpy and rugged more remote inland.
-
The dirt was commonly rough, making cultivating troublesome.
<u>
Chesapeake region:</u>
- The Chesapeake district was, be that as it may, extremely wealthy in soil, and cultivating turned into the primary concern.
- Tobacco, indigo, and rice were the central yields.
-
Religion in the Chesapeake district was not in any manner normal, with the exception of in a couple of zones.
-
The reaction expresses that pioneers in the Chesapeake were increasingly "socialized" with the Indians.
- The province of Maryland was expected as an asylum for Catholics in the wake of being abused when the Catholic Church isolated from the Church of England.
