1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
5

considering the overwhelming advantage the north possessed during the war why did the south nearly win the war give at least thr

ee reasons plz
History
1 answer:
uysha [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Union had to invade, conquer, and occupy the South. It had to destroy the South's capacity and will to resist — a formidable challenge in any war. Southerners enjoyed the initial advantage of morale: The South was fighting to maintain its way of life, whereas the North was fighting to maintain a union.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which was not a limit on post-World War I?
jeka94
Generally speaking, "assembly line jobs" did not represent an obstacle during this time, since this in fact increased productivity through the "specialization of labor". 
3 0
3 years ago
The treaty of paris (1763) divided north america among european powers. explain how england, france, and spain probably viewed t
Verizon [17]

The Treaty of Paris signed in 1763, was the end of the "French-Indian war", a conflict which took place among three major powers at the time : France, Britain and Spain which fought for the colonies in North America. These powers had Native American tribes allied with each one of them and it is called "French - Indian War" because the British considered the French and the Natives to be their enemies.

Spain might have contemplated this as a victory as it expanded its territories to the east, adding territories to their already vast empire of South and Central America. France basically lost their territories in North America,and their interest of exploiting natural resources such as furs. Finally, although British and Americans expanded their territories to the west, this entreprise was greatly expensive for Britain.

4 0
3 years ago
HELP "War between Saddam Hussein and Ayatollah Khomeini was inevitable." To what extent do you agree or disagree with this state
ladessa [460]

Answer:

The war between the two-person was inevitable for several reasons.

Explanation:

In the Middle East, during 1952, there was turbulence among Arabs for a requirement of leadership. The gap filled by Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. Over many years his ideas and evolutionary zeal have provoked French, British, and pro-Western monarchies.

With the death of Nasser in 1970, there was a sudden race for the leadership among the Middle Eastern leaders. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran and President Saddam Hussein of Iraq were among them.

Saddam Hussein advocate progress under the secularism. He believes that a dictatorial government that force modernization is a shortcut to progress.

Ayatollah Khomeini believed that the Middle East controlled by foreign powers. His opinions and ideologies opposed to Saddam Hussein. Ayatollah urged the Shia of Iraq to overthrow his government.

Saddam Hussein invaded Iran in September 1980 where his attack led to forecast Iraq as the new leading power. Saddam led the war between Iraq and Iran for eight-year.

4 0
3 years ago
Who are the main targets of both these leaders’ complaints? What do they specifically object to?
nevsk [136]

From the quote given by the leader which states <em>"Americans, under the existing </em><em>Spanish system</em><em>, occupy a position in society no better than that of serfs"</em>, these leader targeted the Spanish Empire, which colonized most of Latin America. These leaders specifically object to the unfair and inhuman way the colonial master treated the people of the colonies.

<h3>What was Latin America Colonization about?</h3>

The Latin America came to fruition in 1500’s when the European discovered of the New World. Europeans countries such as Spain, France and Portugal colonized the region. Even though most of Latin America was colonized by Spain, the countries of Portugal and France also had major influences on the region.

Due to war & disease, the native populations were decimated and the European countries’ demand for free labor led them to engage in the African slave trade.

Read more about Latin America Colonization

brainly.com/question/17318806

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
The area around Colorado is thought to have been what around 90 million years ago?
Sav [38]
Flat and very very hilly
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who is adam lanza. Ive heard of him but idk who he is.
    7·2 answers
  • While it was Great Britain that ultimately colonized India, it was that colonized much of Southeast Asia (Vietnam, Cambodia, and
    15·2 answers
  • What is the basic difference between autocracy,
    13·1 answer
  • 2. In what ways did both nativists and the immigrants themselves contribute to any of these problems?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the allied powers left the alliance and signed a separate peace with the central powers in 1917?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Saddam Hussein attack Kuwait in 1990?
    8·1 answer
  • Do any of you guys watch xqc?
    7·2 answers
  • The government asked citizens to purchase
    7·2 answers
  • How were the vastly outnumbered British forces able to defeat the French at Agincourt?The British military had more advanced wea
    11·1 answer
  • 3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of isolationism?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!