According to the excerpt, what is one purpose for
2 answers:
You might be interested in
<em>Hi There!!</em>
<em>I think the answer is </em><em>False</em><em>.</em>
<em>Because, I think there was that it was an indirect tax that was hard to protest. related to molasses, which was an everyday item. only required traders to pay the new tax. was an example of taxation without representation.</em>
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this is wrong...</em>
<em>#</em><em> </em>
<em># </em><em> </em>
ヾ(•ω•`)o