Answer:
<u>C. The student moved from being an everyday actor to being a social analyst</u>.
Explanation:
The student was able to compare her parent's income to the rest of the income of the country that qualifies as an upper class. This action right here made her conclude that her way of thinking was not accurate, and she could analyze the economic factor with real data to arrive to a different conclusion.
Answer:
Explanation:
In the book " A Separate Peace" in its tenth chapter we see how that Gene leaves to go to Vermont in an attempt to visit Leper, he then
had this flashback /fast forward experience according to the author – remembering and drawing similarities and parallel of how this journey is to be compared to the journeys he would make in a year time when he would be graduating from the Devon School where he attended soon to be enlisted in the Navy.
He fast forwarded to how that he would often have to make long trips from one base to another in the process continuous training and retraining as new weapons become invented not minding that he has never experienced war first hand before now.
He reminisced that would be depleted and stationed in the United States. He added that there would be an atomic bomb detonation in Japan, which would be the game changer saving their lives by ending the war at last.
As he walked towards Leper's home on alighting the long bus ride through Vermont, he noticed how that the weather was clear and this is something encouraging to him.
If we pick terrorism, Marx and Engels' theory can help us understand that young males in the low social classes, who live in staggeringly unequal societies such as the Arab ones (Arab countries have very high GDP due to oil, yet alarming poverty rates) may feel oppressed and marginalized from the "game" of capital-building.
The problem of inequality in a society's economy might help us understand, in general, how religious fundamentalists have risen in these countries, and how the "Guerrillas" started decades ago in South America, all third world countries who veer their hatred towards the more privileged developed world. We can also remember that the Nazi movement saw its inception in a post-WWI Germany with such high rates of inflation that people brought wheelbarrows stacked with cash to the bakery when buying food, and how these people veered their anger onto a historically wealthy and productive people: the Jews. From this perspective, the true breeding pools of murderous ideologies and massive violent reactions always seem to be highly unequal societies.
On the other hand, Marx and Engels' view of Capitalism as a system that inherently causes suffering, where the rich are to blame for poverty itself and where there is always an oppressor and an oppressed, may divert us from the real problem regarding how demagogues weaponize the dispossessed. The young males that usually end up as militants for these causes feel disenfranchised by society as a whole, not only in the financial sphere of their lives but also socially and psychologically. The belief that the solution to social inequality is just to finance the poor so that they are economically equal to what Marxism would call the "bourgeoisie", is reductionist at best. Since the problem of being disenfranchised by society engulfs the entire individual in all aspects of life, inequality in society needs to be looked at as a problem that is educational, psychological and sociological besides just financial. This includes the fact that viewing the world in terms of only oppressor vs. oppressed is the sign of an immature psyche, the kind of psyche that a demagogue finds easy to manipulate.
I assume you mean in the United Kingdom?
In the United Kingdom the prime minister is appointed by the Queen (or King) who chooses the person who is most likely to have a majority in the House of Commons (most likely the leader of the winning party)
