Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Answer:Ethics is the rational method of deciding what is good for individuals or society.
Explanation:
The appropriate response is Ancient Greece. The ancient Greeks trusted well-being was influenced by the diversion, sex, geographic area, social class, eat fewer carbs, injury, convictions, and outlook. At an opportune time in the antiquated Romans, old Greeks trusted that ailments were "divine disciplines" and that recuperating was a "blessing from the Gods".
In May 1915, the Lusitania was sank by a German U-Boat. About 1200 lives were lost, many hundreds of whom were American. Naturally, the Americans became angry that the Germans sank a ship full of passengers without provocation
