1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MissTica
3 years ago
12

What were the issues that were causing our new country to fall apart

History
2 answers:
Shtirlitz [24]3 years ago
6 0

the articles of confederation was a very weak constitution for the government

Mariana [72]3 years ago
4 0
1. North Korea: Lack of property rights

North Korea’s economic institutions make it almost impossible for people to own property; the state owns everything, including nearly all land and capital. Agriculture is organized via collective farms. People work for the ruling Korean Workers’ Party, not themselves, which destroys their incentive to succeed.

North Korea could be much wealthier. In 1998, a U.N. mission found that many of the country’s tractors, trucks, and other farm machinery were simply unused or not maintained. Beginning in the 1980s, farmers were allowed to have their own small plots of land and sell what they grew. But even this hasn’t created much incentive, given the country’s endemic lack of property rights. In 2009, the government introduced a revalued currency and allowed people to convert only 100,000 to 150,000 won of the old currency into the new one (equivalent to about $35 to $40 at the black-market exchange rate). People who had worked and saved up stocks of the old currency found it to be worthless.

Not only has North Korea failed to grow economically — while South Korea has grown rapidly — but its people have literally failed to flourish. Trapped in this debilitating cycle, North Koreans are not only much poorer than South Koreans but also as much as 3 inches shorter on average than the neighbors from whom they have been cut off for the last six decades.

Gerald Bourke/WFP/GettyImages


2. Uzbekistan: Forced labor

Coercion is a surefire way to fail. Yet, until recently, at least in the scope of human history, most economies were based on the coercion of workers — think slavery, serfdom, and other forms of forced labor. In fact, the list of strategies for getting people to do what they don’t want to do is as long as the list of societies that relied on them. Forced labor is also responsible for the lack of innovation and technological progress in most of these societies, ranging from ancient Rome to the U.S. South.

Modern Uzbekistan is a perfect example of what that tragic past looked like. Cotton is among Uzbekistan’s biggest exports. In September, as the cotton bolls ripen, the schools empty of children, who are forced to pick the crop. Instead of educators, teachers become labor recruiters. Children are given daily quotas from between 20 to 60 kilograms, depending on their age. The main beneficiaries of this system are President Islam Karimov and his cronies, who control the production and sale of the cotton. The losers are not only the 2.7 million children coerced to work under harsh conditions in the cotton fields instead of going to school, but also Uzbek society at large, which has failed to break out of poverty. Its per capita income today is not far from its low level when the Soviet Union collapsed — except for the income of Karimov’s family, which, with its dominance of domestic oil and gas exploration, is doing quite well.

MAXIM MARMUR/AFP/GettyImages


3. South Africa: A tilted playing field

In 1904 in South Africa, the mining industry created a caste system for jobs. From then on, only Europeans could be blacksmiths, brickmakers, boilermakers — basically any skilled job or profession. This “color bar,” as South Africans called it, was extended to the entire economy in 1926 and lasted until the 1980s, robbing black South Africans of any opportunity to use their skills and talents. They were condemned to work as unskilled laborers in the mines and in agriculture — and at very low wages, too, making it extremely profitable for the elite who owned the mines and farms. Unsurprisingly, South Africa under apartheid failed to improve the living standards of 80 percent of its population for almost a century. For 15 years before the collapse of apartheid, the South African economy contracted. Since 1994 and the advent of a democratic state, it has grown consistently.

WALTER DHLADHLA/AFP/GettyImages





You might be interested in
How was hitler able to take control of czechoslovakia?
s2008m [1.1K]
Hitler took control of the western forts so they couldnt defend themselves 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were called factories during the british rule
adoni [48]

Answer: i think it was called atmospheric steam engine

4 0
3 years ago
Why was the Hijrah important?
ivann1987 [24]

Answer: C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why didn't early Portuguese and Dutch explorers decide to create settlements in Australia? A. They didn't think the land was sui
kirza4 [7]
B. Local natives successfully defeated Dutch and Portuguese forces.
5 0
3 years ago
An is a system of beliefs that people work to protect
notka56 [123]

Answer:

Religion

Explanation: People such as Muslims for example will fight for their faith by even killing themselves or others.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why where American settlers attracted the great plain in the 18
    10·1 answer
  • why were roads significant to the roman republic and ancient cultures and religions of the same time period
    15·1 answer
  • Who did Europe try to appease hitler
    15·1 answer
  • What is a paradox? An example please
    6·2 answers
  • All citizens are required to ​
    14·2 answers
  • Describe ways Texas and its citizens contributed to the Allied war effort during World War II.
    5·2 answers
  • Who were Ferdinand and Isabella, and how did their marriage change Spain?
    7·2 answers
  • what event led to the declaration of martial law during the time of former president ferdinand ?? (about the old president on Ph
    8·1 answer
  • The Wilmot Proviso...
    14·2 answers
  • Socrates believed in absolute standers for truth and justice. Sophists believed that standards of truth and justice are in the e
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!