<em>The inconsistency is: the writing states that the cell phones are a monumental distraction at school but it encourages its usage at the same time.</em>
According to the text, young peoples' attention should be focused on learning and the phones disturb the process. Therefore, they should be strictly forbidden at school. But there is no point in forbidding them, if using them to communicate with parents is seen as something positive and purposeful. This does not make any sense, this is double standards, the school should either allow the phones at school and not complain about them at all, or it should prohibit their usage without any exceptions such as communicating with parents or taking pictures with friends.
Answer:
It is empathy towards things
or
Pathos towards things
Explanation:
From the given choices: l<span>uxurious, arrogant, elegant, pretentious and fashionable
The words with positive connotation would be luxurious, elegant and fashionable. (there words represent a good sense of style of the described object/person).
The words arrogant and pretentious refer to the more egoistic qualities of people and do not have a positive connotation.
Hope I helped :) </span>
Answer:
The error in the given sentence is a punctuation error.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the error is in the use of quotation marks for the name of the book. Using quotations for names of books, movies, or any title is an important factor of any correct sentence writing.
And as such, the use of this punctuation mark will enable the readers to understand what the speaker is talking about. The given sentence must be correctly written as
<u><em>"Cry, the Beloved Country" was such a good book! I've never seen the movie, though.
</em></u>
Thus, the error in the given sentence is a punctuation error.
