1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garik1379 [7]
3 years ago
7

What had dill said he had been able to capture in his letter to scout

English
2 answers:
Dahasolnce [82]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

what?

Explanation:

is that the question or what?

KengaRu [80]3 years ago
8 0
Is that a question?
You might be interested in
What tone does the narrator use in the excerpt from sonnet 18 by william shakespeare?
storchak [24]

a barber, is having an internal conversation with himself while shaving the beard of Captain Torres. Based on the word choice of the narrator, select the choice that BEST describes the narrator's tone toward his customer, Captain Torres.



7 0
3 years ago
Which of these is an example of personification?
kherson [118]
C. The star winked at me
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which word or words and punctuation best corrects any errors in the sentence? I don't have any bait for fishing however we could
mezya [45]
It is "D <span>fishing, however,</span>" 
5 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
¿Cómo diferencia el uso de verbos con él / ella / ello en presente simple?
lora16 [44]

Answer:

los verbos son todos iguales.

Explanation:

por ejemplo.

"He is running to the store."

"She is running to the store."

"It is running to the store."

son todos iguales pero de diferente género

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • MS. FONG: Let’s take a look at page 50. What does the author mean when he writes, “The sounds of the leaves rustling in the wind
    8·1 answer
  • When he first finds the conch, Piggy states that he once saw one on a person’s wall in England and that it’s “ever so valuable.”
    7·1 answer
  • 11 miles in 11 minutes what is my speed
    15·2 answers
  • 50 Points! Please write me a short story , ill give extra points . 5 paragraphs minimum
    9·1 answer
  • When looking up rhe meaning of the word integrity in the dictionary it wpuld be found before which of the following words
    8·1 answer
  • Which one would you choose? Explain in complete sentence.
    13·1 answer
  • Anyone good at English will give brainliest ​
    8·2 answers
  • Though you grades at the b.e.c.e were very good ,none of the schools you chosed offered admission .write a letter to your distri
    14·1 answer
  • Does anyone have any book recommendations for a school book report?
    8·2 answers
  • Read the paragraph.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!