Answer: They trusted and were able to rely on each other and gave constant attention that didn't break the bond between them
Explanation:
The crime of arson is a crime that is ordinarily defined in the law as the criminal damage or the unlawful destruction of some property by means of fire.
In almost all countries except Great Britain, an arsonist is guilty of murder if any person dies as a result of their action, even if the offender did not intend to kill. In Germany and in some states of the United States, serious penalties are also imposed for the offense of arson when it is committed to disguise or destroy the evidence (or evidence) of another criminal act.
Although accidental burning or ordinary carelessness are not considered arson, a person may be found guilty of the crime of arson, if he causes a fire without due prudence for the consequences of his actions.
The Chicago School focused on cities as <u>natural formations</u>; however, most contemporary theory and research in urban sociology focus on cities as the <u>created environments.</u>
What does Chicago School focus on in cities?
The Chicago School (also known as the Ecological School) was a sociological and criminological school of thought that originated at the University of Chicago and whose work was prominent in the early twentieth century.
The Chicago School, founded in 1892, rose to international prominence as the epicenter of sophisticated sociological thought between 1915 and 1935, when their work was the first major body of study to concentrate on urban sociology. Their study into the Chicago urban environment would also have an impact in merging theory with ethnographic fieldwork.
Therefore, The Chicago School focused on cities as <u>natural formations</u>; however, most contemporary theory and research in urban sociology focus on cities as the <u>created environments.</u>
For more information <u>on schools,</u> refer to the given link:
brainly.com/question/10099838
#SPJ4
Answer:
Chief Justice Roger Taney declared Missouri Compromise to be illegal and unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise seen was a crucial agreement to balance the power in Congress between slave and free states. The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to settle the dispute. As a result, it banned slavery in the north (Louisiana territory) from the southern line of latitude 36 degrees 30'. It was during The Dred Scott v. Sandford judgment by the Supreme Court found that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. Roger Taney affirmed that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because Congress had no authority to forbid slavery in territories. To justify his statement, he mentions about the Fifth Amendment that gives citizens (slave master) a right to have property rights.
