Answer:
Quota Sampling
Explanation:
Quota sampling: In statistics or research methods, the term "quota sampling" is described as one of the "non-probability sampling" techniques in which the collected sample consists of the same quantity or numbers of individuals or participants as an entire population concerning well-known traits, characteristics or focused phenomenon possesses.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the quota sampling.
Answer: They believed that they were just there and no god they probably only thought about survival
Answer:
C. Poor motor planning
Explanation:
Poor motor planning can be defined as the inability of a person to carryout tasks because the person brain cannot process sensory information including the neural connection in the brain of that person leading to POOR MOTOR PLANNING.
A person that has poor motor planning may be unable to write properly and form words.
Although Dyspraxia disorder can cause inability of a person to plan and effectively process motor tasks eventhough the person intelligent may not be affected but it mostly cause learning problem in children..
Therefore poor motor planning is the inability of a person to organize the body's actions which is why Raysor has difficulty in writing.
According to the scenario the type of problem Raysor shows is POOR MOTOR PLANNING
The "elastic clause" in the United States Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws needed to operate the national government. This statement is found in Article 1 in the United States Constitution.
The answer would be letter B or choice B.
Religious freedom is the freedom to develop and live according to religious beliefs at the same time it does not interfere with the same freedom of others.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 determined that the Government must not burden a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, only if the burden was necessary for the government interest.
It protects religious freedom more than the Free Exercise Clause because the Clause does not protect people from the government’s burden, it only demands religious neutral law, which eventually can be a burden a religion.
