Top Ten Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions<span> ... A detailed reference is "The </span>historical earthquakes<span> of Syria: an analysis of large and ... </span>Some<span> authors suggest the accounts may refer to a typhoon rather than an </span>earthquake<span>.</span>
Answer:
please ask full questions
Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
