1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
9

In 1998 the supreme court ruled in clinton v. city of new york that

History
1 answer:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
8 0
<span>The Court ruled that because the Act allowed the President to unilaterally alter or remove parts of duly enacted </span>statutes, i<span>t violated the </span>Presentment Clause<span> of the Constitution.</span>
You might be interested in
Should the Natives have been forced into assimilation, explain?
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

 Many American leaders in the 1870s and 1880s thought that Indians should be encouraged or even forced to assimilate.  That means they wanted Indians to leave their tribes and ways of life, and instead adopt American ways of life.  

  (Assimilation means to blend into a different culture.)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Who led the American troops that defeated the British at Vincennes in present -day Indi
ikadub [295]

Answer: George Rogers Clark

Explanation: The Siege of Fort Vincennes was a Revolutionary War frontier battle fought in present-day Vincennes, Indiana won by a militia led by American commander George Rogers Clark over a British garrison led by Lieutenant Governor Henry Hamilton, the battle started on February 23, 1779 and ended February 25, 1779.

5 0
3 years ago
Foreign countries do not respect American independence. Although the Treaty of Paris granted the United States all the land east
klio [65]

Answer:

No. The Articles of Confederation had a weak government that couldn't enforce laws and was powerless.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Different types interactions that the japanese had with foreigners
xenn [34]
Attacked the us at petal harbor. Then the Japanese people in the us were out in camps because they were thought to all be guilty
3 0
3 years ago
Was the Treaty of Versailles a reasonable punishment for Germany? (explain your reasoning with multiple sentences)
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

The Treaty of Versailles was not a reasonable punishment for Germany because they were not the ones who started the war and they were not the only ones who fought for the Axis/Central Powers.

Explanation:

The amount of money the Germans had to pay should have been split between the other countries who fought with Germany and Austria-Hungary should have gotten this blame/Punishment but they didn´t because Germany was more powerful and stronger than the other Countries that were on the same side. It also stripped Germany´s 13% of its land, along with the population. Germany was forced to pay 269 billion while their Military was also stripped down in numbers.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is another word to take away in social studies six letter word
    14·1 answer
  • How did the danish resist German soldiers and what were the effects
    8·1 answer
  • Why was Japan was so successful in expanding its territory in 1942?
    14·2 answers
  • How weak and corrupt rulers affected the government and the economy.
    8·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Flannery O’Connor’s “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” “My only,” the old woman said, “and she’s the swe
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why there were changes in the prison system in the period c1700–c1900.
    12·1 answer
  • What are the three features in the U.S constitution?​
    14·1 answer
  • How did Madison propose to improve the economy in the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • Do presidential debates still matter?
    11·1 answer
  • What were three important influences on the growth of<br> democracy in America?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!