Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
By using the percentage-of-completion method the $64 million revenue should Parmac recognize in 2018
Explanation:
Percentage-of-completion method : Under this method,
First we have to calculate the percentage which is based on current period cost to total period cost.
After that, multiply the percentage with the revenue so that we get to know how much revenue is being recognized during an particular year.
In mathematically,
Estimated Cost percentage = current period cost ÷ total period cost
= $48 million ÷ $120 million
= 40%
Now,
Revenue recognized = Estimated cost percentage × Revenue
= 40% × $160 million
= $64 million
Hence, by using the percentage-of-completion method the $64 million revenue should Parmac recognize in 2018
Answer:
The fixed costs per unit when 20,000 units are produced are $6.05 per unit.
Explanation:
Fixed costs per unit can be determined by using the following formula:
Fixed costs per unit = Total fixed costs/ number of units are produced
In a company, Total fixed costs do not depend on the level of activity (Fixed costs do not change).
In the company, Total fixed cost = $11 x 11,000 = $121,000
When 20,000 units are produced, Fixed costs per unit = $121,000/20,000 = $6.05 per unit.
Negative attitude can lead to high turnover
