Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
There are to be exact only 2 ways to answer this equation because of the way math was made.
Triple t ⇒ 3t
add the result to u ⇒ 3t + u
multiply what you have by v ⇒ (3t + u)v
Since it is instructed not to simplify, we perform the distributive property of multiplication.
(3t + u)v = 3tv + uv
Hi there
The answer is
b.) y=8,000(1.14)^x
Good luck!
