The economics concepts of income effect and substitution effect express changes in the market and how these changes impact consumption patterns for consumer goods and services. The income effect expresses the impact of increased purchasing power on consumption, while the substitution effect describes how consumption is impacted by changing relative prices. Different goods and services experience these changes in different ways. Some products, called inferior goods, generally decrease in consumption whenever incomes increase. Consumer spending and consumption of normal goods typically increases with higher purchasing power, in contrast with inferior goods.
Read more: What's the difference between the income effect and the substitution effect? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041415/whats-difference-between-income-effect-and-substitution-effect.asp#ixzz4wcsy3IOK
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
Answer: D. If one country creates all the reserves it can prevent other countries from trading.
Explanation:
<em>Ditching the Dollar</em> refers to a movement by nations to reduce the dependence on the US. dollar for transactions.
The USD is the major currency for trade around the world with it accounting for the currency of use in more than 50% of the entire World trade. This was due to the Bretton Woods Agreement and System which at the time pegged the USD to gold and other currencies at certain value to the USD.
The influence the USD gained that day continues today. Countries however are increasing becoming fed up by the United States using the Dollar to impose trade restrictions and sanctions on countries and then requiring everyone to fall in line because trades are mostly done in the currency controlled by the US, the USD.
For instance, when sanctions were imposed on Iran, the European Union looked for alternative means of payment for Iranian oil.
Ditching the Dollar therefore argues that having multiple reserve currencies to choose from is healthy because one country will not be able to control world trade as the US has.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of the internal rate of return is shown below:
Given that
The expected cash inlfows would be $9,400 for four years each
Rate of return is 7%
The Initial investment is $30,455
Based on the above information
The net present value is
= $9,400 × PVIFA factor for 7% at 4 years - $30,455
= $9,400 × 3.3872 - $30,455
= $31,840 - $30,455
= $1,385
Now the present value factor is
= $30,455 ÷ $9,400
= 3.2399
Now based on the factor table, the rate should be 9% for four years
b. Yes depend upon the internal rate of return, the park co should make the investment
Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
Answer:
August 2 Notes Receivable 8000 Dr
Accounts Receivable- Ryan 8000 Cr
October 30 Interest receivable 220 Dr
Interest Revenue 220 Cr
October 31 Cash 8220 Dr
Notes Receivable 8000 Cr
Interest Receivable 220 Cr
Explanation:
When we receive the Note against the Accounts Receivable, we will credit the Accounts Receivable to close the account of Ryan and create a new current asset account of Notes Receivable on August 2.
On October 30, 90 days period of Note is complete so we will record the interest that is receivable for us on this note.
- Interest Receivable = 8000 * 11% * 90/360 = $220
We record this as Interest Receivable as we have not received this and credit Interest revenue as it is our income.
On 31 October, when we receive cash it will be total of Notes payable and Interest so we will debit cash by 8220 and credit the Notes payable and interest receivable.
