Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
I believe the answer is: its emergency lights are flashing
When is emergency lights are flashing, the wrecker would most likely driving toward the area where accidents happen, and they would be used to drag out ruins or the heavy vehicles that collided on the sites. Because of this, we need to provide space for the wrecker to pass if it shows its emergency lights.
According to answers.com its greenbacks
Answer: company’s direct labor budget = $320000
Explanation:
Given that,
Standard hourly labor rate in the Cutting Department = $12
It takes 30 minutes of direct labor time to cut the lumber
Tables take one hour to assemble
Standard hourly rate in the Assembly Department = $10
Lunchco’s production budget = 20,000
Cutting Department = production budget × direct labor time × Standard hourly labor rate
= 20000 × 0.5 hours/unit × $12/unit
= $120000
Assembly Department = production budget × Tables take one hour to assemble × Standard hourly labor rate
= 20000 × 1 hour/unit × $10/unit
= $200000
Therefore,
company’s direct labor budget = Assembly Department + Cutting Department
= 200000 + 120000
= $320000
