The union uses the scorched earth policy in Georgia to destroy the resources
to destroy resources
<u>Explanation:</u>
Sherman thought that by using a total war strategy would bring the horror of the war to the people, and it helped to end the war.
His force followed a scorched earth policy, for destroying the military target such as industry, infrastructure and civilian property and disturbing the confederacy economy, and transportation economy the policy states that it is aims to destroy the enemy resources and to occupy the areas which is wealthy.
Answer:
"No politician will sacrifice short-term economic welfare" is a concept that implies that politicians, in their desire to have a positive political image (with the aim of winning elections and staying in power), do not take measures that, despite If necessary, they may affect the economy in one way or another in the short term, as this notoriously affects public opinion and leads voters to seek other alternatives to the rulers who have taken such measures. Thus, measures such as economic regulation with the aim of protecting the environment are avoided, since they affect the economy in the short term and tend to subtract votes from politicians.
The answer is option D "Republican Party." Because of the fight over slavery as a result of it was the <span>Republican Party. There are two parties that are in battle with each other the democrats and the republicans both have there separate views on the government and how to government should be.
Hope this helps!
</span>
The USA PATRIOT Act was enacted in 2001 as a reponse to the September 11 attacks and signed by President George Bush. The name of this act is actually an acronym which stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001"
It has generated controversy since its enactment as, due to the provisions included to increase national security. Its promoters argued it was a necessary measure to suceed on the war against terrorism. On the other hand, its detractors claimed that these provisions went against individual freedoms and basic civic rights.
For example, Tittle II confers increased powers to surveillance agencies and bodies dependent of the federal government. Some of these powers include authorizations for detentions of immigrants of indefinite duration, or to search homes or businesses without the consent or knowledge of its owner or tenant.
the president appoints the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
